Sunday, July 8, 2007

RATATOUILLE

Pixar’s latest crowning achievement is animated splendor.


There are so many great things to say about Ratatouille. Unfortunately, most of those great things have already been said by the top film critics in America. In my opinion, Pixar has proven itself over and over by always trying its hand at something new. With Ratatouille, they succeeded in telling their most eccentric and unusual story yet with amazing charm, appeal, and computer animation that deserves only the best compliments. For me, its hard to explain why I love something as much as a movie about a rat that wishes to be a gourmet chef in Paris. I can give a few details, but my natural reaction is something I prefer not to dig too much into.

I can never say enough about the genius and talent of director Brad Bird. Even though he came on board a few years into the process, his influence is still felt in the movie.


The character designs are some of the best I have seen in any animated film. In Pixar’s previous films, I sometimes had a hard time judging the character designs, because it seemed like they were designed specifically with computer rigging in mind. And because of that, I couldn’t see where any artistic influence could make its way in the design process (of course I learned my lesson after seeing the fantastic Pixar exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art two years ago).



When I saw The Incredibles (also directed by Brad Bird), it was the first time I watched computer animation and could actually see the design elements of the characters. I could imagine their faces, poses, and expressions drawn out on paper. That film is what truly turned my head with computer animation.





The expressions of the various characters is handled beautifully. There is a whole new level of acting here. The rats are all designed in ways that they can stretch and emote physically, yet still maintain their rodent-like traits. The sequence when Remy first falls into Gusteau’s kitchen and is scurrying about, trying not to get caught, is priceless character acting.






The main human character, Linguini, is a new step in Pixar’s acting. Linguini is a huge step-forward in physical comedy. Let it be known that the physical comedy inspired by Charles Chaplin and Harpo Marx has not gone out of fashion.


The story is so rich and textured. The characters are all handled with incredible focus. And there wasn’t too much dialog. I am thrilled, because one of the biggest problems with most animated features today is that they use way too much dialog. They are trying to give big-name actors as much chit-chat as possible, so they will have their money’s worth. In Ratatouille, the voice acting is some of the most impressive Pixar has ever had, and yet there isn’t too much dialog, which I love. Animation is all about the expression for me, and all about the essence of the emotion that comes out.

In one scene later on in the movie, there is a monologue from of the characters. Anton Ego (played by Peter O’Toole), a dark, acerbic food critic, has an epiphany and writes a generally positive review. In the review, he opens up on how critics generally thrive on negative criticism, mostly because it is fun to write. In writing this review, I have to agree. This review was hard for me to write, because there was so much about this movie that I loved. It has the potential to go on to become a timeless classic.

If there is anything I question, it is the criticisms I have read thus far. I have read lack of memorable characters (disagree), lack of memorable dialog (not a problem), dialog being too normal (What the hell is wrong with that?), or the writing being too emotional. My answer, animation can tell any story, in any style, in any genre, any way that makes the story work, and any way that the artists can be original.

I do have a few criticisms of my own. Just a couple of character positions I disagreed with. And of course, I disliked the poster. Somehow, I find Remy’s expression on the poster to be kind of perverted.


Then again, there’s no such thing as a perfect film. But that shouldn’t stop one from seeing this fantastic film.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

SURF'S UP ~ at least things are starting to look up.



Sorry I haven't been here in a while. Anyway, here's a new review.

I have just seen Surf's Up twice, and I have to say, it is a huge step forward. That's not to say its a great movie, which it is not, but just a huge improvement. For Sony Animation, it is a tremendous improvement in story and design over their last project, Open Season (which I shall say no more about).




This project was ten times more interesting to me than Happy Feet. The characters are well designed and very expressive (my two biggest compliments). The characters and their relationships are given plenty of depth, as well. And in terms of writing, it appears that someone's trying to be original. It seems now we have animation meeting the world of the "mockumentary." This world is currently ruled by the work of Christopher Guest and his troupe (movies such as Best In Show and A Mighty Wind). Yet the cornerstone of the mockumentary genre remains 1984's This Is Spinal Tap. Check these movies out if you haven't. Funny Stuff there.

As for the celebrity voices, some ups and downs.


Jeff Bridges manages to pull it off here with his character (pictured above). His voice has plenty of personality to go around. Plus, I've always enjoyed voices like his, similar to John DiMaggio's Bender voice on Futurama. The rest do an okay job, I guess.


The character above turned out to be one of my favorites in the whole movie. His name is Mikey (voiced by comedian Mario Cantone), and he has some of the best lines in the movie. Particularly one about migraine medicine.

All in all. Something worth checking out. Pretty enjoyable. Not the best though. Still too many cultural references in the way, and a couple of the characters aren't fully developed. But still worthwhile.

Monday, May 21, 2007

SHREK THE THIRD

Before reading any further, let me get this out in the open: Yes! I only saw this movie just so I could write this review.





(images taken from Rotten Tomatoes).

Shrek the Third is no different from the other two Shrek movie. Same characters meeting new characters based on fairy tales. Over-used dialog and an endless supply of unnecessary celebrity voices. The plot is mostly predictable and too preachy in some parts. The same lessons we hear all the time in family features nowadays. Our parents can do a better job than this movie.
My biggest problem with the Shrek movies is that there isn’t anything about them that is timeless. Because they are based around too many celebrity actors and modern pop-culture references, the movies seem set in a specific time frame. I can’t see children forty or fifty years from now showing enough interest in these movies. Not unless they are real retro fanatics. What is it that makes movies like the old Disney features so timeless (Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Pinocchio). Even later year movies like The Little Mermaid are still remembered fondly.
As an animator, I have many technical and artistic quips about the Shrek films as well. And this isn’t an anti-CG opinion. I find the movement to be too robotic and the posing to be quite stiff. There isn’t enough exaggeration in these films. They are going way too far with this “Illusion of Life” thing that Disney started. How about just trying to tell a good story and keeping audiences interested? And I cannot ignore my beef with the use of celebrity voice-overs in today’s money-run animation industry. Animated films need real actors, not just pop stars like Justin Timberlake (in his first and hopefully last voice over role).


All in all, this movie is entertaining for a few watches. After that, no chance of surviving in a time capsule.

Friday, May 11, 2007

Some of my favorite comedy.

I just thought I'd share these two clips. During the last week of the semester, I sometimes let off steam by watching one of these two clips. I think they are extremely funny, and the type of humor used in both I think would work wonderfully in animation. I hope one day to learn how to write stuff like this.

THE FISHER KING
(d. Terry Gilliam, 1991)

In this scene from THE FISHER KING, Jeff Bridges' character is playing cupid for his mentally-lost friend. In order to lure the woman of his friend's dreams (Amanda Plummer), Bridges employs an out-of-work Cabaret singer (Michael Jeter). I think Jeter's performance here is priceless.



THE MEANING OF LIFE
(d. Terry Jones, 1983)

What can I say about Monty Python, except brilliant. It's impossible not to laugh at this brand of humor. British humor has always been intriguing, but not like Python's. I love both the scene and the song in this clip from THE MEANING OF LIFE. I would say the clip is pretty self-explanitory.

The longer clip from the movie is just as funny. I recommend this for those of you who are not offended, and in need of a good laugh.

See you soon.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Summer Time

Well, my summer has started. I have an internship lined up with one of New York's independent animation studios, London Squared. I look forward to working with Andy and Carolyn London on their usually inventive projects.


The Pratt Animation show was amazing. IVAN'S ACT had place in it, along with a few other junior shorts. And all the senior films were amazing. Now the juniors and I have to top that next year.


And in the meantime, here is what I managed to finish so far on my 40 second short, STORYBOARDERS. I hope to finish more of it during the summer.

And you can expect to see more updates than usual on the blog.

So, cheers.

Friday, April 20, 2007

"Autobahn" ~ An animated odyssey

A little known music video from 1979, two years before MTV, and two years before anybody even knew what a video was.

Actually, to call this a music video is wrong. It is simply a wonderful animated piece set to the breakthrough track of German Electronic pioneers Kraftwerk. It was animated by Roger Mainwood, and produced by Halas and Batchelor, one of the premier animation studios in the United Kingdom.






Normally, I am not an immediate fan of plotless animated shorts. The main reason is that they are likely to lose the audience's attention due to the lack of story. However, there are ways to save shorts like that. In the case of this one, you have both a catchy ambient track, and characters with unusual appeal. In my opinion, this could be FANTASIA segment, if FANTASIA were set to experimental rock instrumentals (something I know I would see). I really like the overall look of the animation. The coloring and timing are great, and really give an expressive sense of surrealism.

Thursday, April 5, 2007

A month since the Rat.

I apologize for not keeping up with the blog. My schedule has just been getting busier. And it is looking to be even busier this month. April is the month of finals, and my peers and I are all cramming away. Or as much as we can, without losing our sanity.

Currently, I am working on a forty second animated short for my class. Although I was supposed to come up with a different way of animating, this one may turn out to be closer to how I did the RATS MONO short. There was a certain style I wanted to try out, but I proved to be too complicated, and I couldn't find the right idea for it. I know I'm only a student, but I can get pretty stubborn about these things. The way I am doing this short is actually the most efficient way for me to do it. Any other method (as far as I think I know) would take longer than the time I already I have.


The image here is a color test I did (though it would make a nice postcard as well). This is basically what the bulk of the short will look like.
The short is a combination of the styles of two relatively well known independent animators. The first is Paul Driessen, a Dutch-Canadian animator know for animating in more than one panel in a single image, as well as for a swirling illustrative style that defies any sense of form. He was also an animator on THE BEATLES YELLOW SUBMARINE, which today remains one of my all-time favorite films.
The other animator I sourced is a French animator, Raimund Krumme. Krumme's style involves defying the image's supposed perception. When the image looks like one thing, it gradually becomes another (if this is too confusing, click on Krumme's name, and you can see what I am talking about.

For this short, I am using three characters that I have already animated, for I did not have enough time to come up with any new characters. I have begun making a list of stuff to practice this summer, in preparation for my senior thesis next semester. And one of those things is to come up with new characters for my project.


Coming at the beginning of May, there will be a screening for the animators of Pratt Institute. It will be the Senior Thesis films, along with some Junior vignettes. I am hoping to get something in it. I am hoping to have RATS MONO fully colored by then, so maybe I can submit that.


I will sign off with one of my favorite music videos. This is "Quiet Eyes" by Dutch rock group Golden Earring. Although I don't really listen to them, I think this video is very charming. It is directed by Anton Corbijn, one of my favorite photographers and music video directors.

See you around.